Introduction

А. В. Чесунов

In recent years, there has appeared an increasing number of studies on assessment of biodiversity levels in fauna and flora of individual small areas, landscape zones, countries, and the world as a whole. Such data are important as a basis for development of principles and techniques of biodiversity conservation in the conditions of developing national and inter-state environmental management systems. The more we know about biodiversity, the better we can use it without causing damage. Furthermore, such information is required for comparative analysis of local, zonal, and global structure of the biota of the Earth, and understanding of its laws.

The aim of this catalogue was to present the biodiversity of a geographically limited area covered by the educational and scientific activities of the White Sea Biological Station of Moscow State University (MSU WSBS). The catalogue of the MSU WSBS biota includes more than 6,000 species of bacteria, protistas, fungi, plants and animals, that live in all habitats (land, sea, fresh water) on an area of ​​about 40 square kilometers. On this very small plot of land and sea, at the latitude of the Arctic Circle, there are present the four main kingdoms, 64 phylums, and 152 classes of the biota of our planet. Today, the MSU WSBS vicinity is one of the most well-studied parts of our planet, by the number of studied species per unit of area. As human impact in the WSBS vicinity is very insignificant, due to the area remoteness from major settlements and industrial enterprises, absence of runoff of polluted rivers; absence of large-scale logging, industrial fishing and seaweed gathering; and due to weak recreational and tourist load; the biota of MSU WSBS vicinity can be considered as undisturbed and regarded as a model biota for the White Sea and the northern European taiga.

The biological Station was founded in 1938, and in this way, it has the over 70 year history of an inventory of its flora and fauna. This was achieved by the WSBS staff, by invited researchers and specialists in different taxons, by professors, and by students. The biota studies are stimulated by annual student field practices. Each year, samples from from land and sea travel are brought, and under supervision of professors, is analysed, sorted, drawn, photographed, and defined. Interesting samples and specimens are preserved and sent for further study in Moscow to various chairs of the MSU Department of Biology, and other academic institutions. Almost every year, researchers discover at the WSBS vicinity, new species, previously unknown in the WSBS area, in the White Sea area, or new to science.

The initial idea of the catalogue belongs to the former WSBS employee, Natalya Mikhailovna Kalyakina. For several years she has collected an impressive array of fauna and flora lists, from professors and researchers. This work turned out to be quite complicated. The reality was that not all researchers had a tradition to compile such lists for large groups of animals or plants. Thus, botanists have compiled lists of vascular plants of the WSBS and then have been continuously updating them; while zoologists did not have such lists as a common practice. They just knew, for example, what kinds of bivalves can be found in the Velikaya Salma and how to find them, or what kinds of butterflies can be found at the station power line swath. Compilation of more formal fauna lists lists, required both some additional effort from the authors and constant perseverance from N.M.Kalyakina. We had to verify additionally many lists in order to confirm the validity and completeness of the Latin names, using taxonomic databases and involving competent experts, who, in most cases, became co-authors of the lists. In total, compilation of the catalog involved 68 authors. In all lists, species are ranked according to the traditional Linnaean hierarchical system, with mandatory listing of main taxonomic ranks (species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, kingdom); where appropriate, the intermediate ranks are given.

Authors, whose names are listed under the name of the corresponding taxon, bear all responsibility for the integrity and authenticity of the lists. Some lists display species just as names, consisted of two words, without any additional information. Other lists may contain brief information on habitat, occurrence (common or rare), substrate, hosts, etc. Some of the most comprehensive lists (e.g. embryophytes) also contain information on the extinct or new species in the WSBS vicinity. The lists are based both on published and original personal data of the authors. The published data contains references to corresponding publications.

Район исследований биоты определяется маршрутами учебных практик. Достаточно подробно и равномерно исследован Киндо полуостров на восток от Ершовских озёр, а также окружающие его морские акватории. В то же время в Каталог включены виды, обнаруженные в нескольких более отдалённых изолированных точках, где планомерно собирается материал для регулярных практических курсов, студенческих самостоятельных работ и научных исследований – Чёрная река, Нильма, острова Крестовые, Кастьян, Величаиха, Кокоиха. Эти точки отделены от Киндо-полуострова обширными пространствами, где фауна и флора изучены плохо. Те виды, что зарегистрированы и в этих или только в этих отдалённых точках, специально помечены в списках.

The biota study area is defined by the routes of educational practices. Sufficient detail and uniformly investigated Kindo Peninsula to the east of the Ershov Lakes and its surrounding marine areas. At the same time, the catalog includes species found in several more remote isolated locations where the material is going according to plan for regular practical courses and student independent work and research - Black River, Nilma, islands Crusades, Kastyan, Velichaiha, Kokoiha. These points are separated from the Kindo-vast expanses of the peninsula, where the fauna and flora are poorly understood. Those species that are registered and in these, or only in these remote locations, especially marked in the lists.

Из представленных видовых перечней видно, насколько неравномерно изучена территория ББС. Для некоторых больших групп списки выглядят полностью или почти полностью законченными (высшие растения, позвоночные), если не считать будущего возможного исчезновения или появления каких-то видов. Списки видов крупных морских беспозвоночных, книдарий, моллюсков, высших ракообразных, кольчатых червей, иглокожих по-видимому, также мало увеличатся в будущем. А вот степень изученности мелких беспозвоночных, таких как мейобентосные нематоды, гарпактикоидные веслоногие рачки гораздо ниже, несмотря на приведённые в Каталоге впечатляющие цифры их видового обилия. К сожалению, до сих пор нет данных о видовом составе таких групп как турбеллярии, гастротрихи и, конечно, о многих группах жгутиконосцев, голых саркодовых, эпибентических инфузорий. В списках наземной биоты бросается в глаза отсутствие данных о многоножках, многих групп паукообразных, кроме клещей (так, список видов пауков ограничен только супралит.ными формами) и крайняя неполнота сведений по многим отрядам насекомых. Очень мало затронута фауна почв и подстилки. Наконец, практически не затронуто огромное разнообразие прокариотных организмов (кроме сине-зелёных водорослей). Конечно, получение полного списка видов всех живых организмов локальной биоты – практически непосильная задача. Таких полных списков до сих пор нет ни для одной точки планеты. Однако, если бы удалось провести исследования и получить данные по видовому составу отсутствующих и бедно представленных в Каталоге групп, в будущем можно получить более сбалансированное представление о богатстве и структуре разнообразия биоты ББС.

From the lists of species seen how unevenly studied area BBS. For some large groups of lists look completely or almost completely finished (the higher plants, vertebrates), except for a possible future appearance or disappearance of some species. Lists of species of large marine invertebrates, cnidarians, mollusks, crustaceans higher, annelids, echinoderms, apparently, with little increase in the future. But the degree of scrutiny of small invertebrates, such as meiobenthic nematodes, copepods garpaktikoidnye much lower, though listed in the catalog of impressive numbers of species abundance. Unfortunately, there is still no data on the species composition of such groups as Turbellaria, gastrotrichs and, of course, many groups of flagellates, naked sarkodovyh, epibenticheskih ciliates. The lists of terrestrial biota conspicuous lack of data on centipedes, many groups of spiders, but ticks (for example, a list of spider species is limited only by supralit.nymi forms) and an extreme lack of information on many insect orders. Very little affected by soil fauna and litter. Finally, it is almost not affected by a huge variety of prokaryotic organisms (except blue-green algae). Of course, obtaining a complete list of all living organisms, the local biota - almost impossible task. Such complete list so far there is no one point of the planet. However, if it were possible to conduct research and obtain data on the species composition of the missing and poorly represented in the catalog of groups in the future can get a balanced view of the richness and diversity of the biota structure of the BBC.

The editors are sincerely grateful to Alexander B. Tsetlin, the WSBS director and MSU Professor of Invertebrate Zoology for his multilateral support, which contributed significantly to the successful completion of this project of creation of the WSBS biota catalogue.